Archive

"Specificity of Man-Made and Natural Disasters in Russia"

Fedyanin, Vitaly Ivanovich, Kvashnina, Galina Anatolyevna, Shutkin, Alexander Nikolayevich

Abstract

Todays human economic activity and its impact on the environment have significantly increased the likelihood of crisis situations caused by natural factors. A crisis situation is defined as a situation that develops in a given region as a result of an accident, hazardous natural phenomenon, catastrophe, natural disaster, or other incident that has already resulted in, or may result in, loss of life, harm to the health of citizens or the environment, significant material losses, and disruption to normal life. Thus, a natural crisis situation is based on a hazardous natural phenomenon. Natural emergencies are commonly classified as geophysical and geological, meteorological and hydrological, hydrogeological and marine hydrological hazards, and wildfires. The mere presence of these natural phenomena, in our opinion, does not necessarily indicate a disastrous or abnormal state of affairs. The authors of this article believe it is important, when examining this topic, to focus on their key characteristics and the factors influencing their development.

Keywords: nature, earth, society, humans, plants.

Full text PDF

  1. Annenkov V.I. Rossiya i yadernyj mir: aspekty nacionalnoj bezopasnosti. M., 2004. 287 s.
  2. Arnold V.I. Teoriya katastrof. 5-e izd. M.: Editorial USSR, 2009. 136 s.
  3. Balaganskij I.A. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye katastrofy: uchebnoe posobie. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2003. 97 s.
  4. Bykov A.A. Problemy analiza bezopasnosti cheloveka, obshchestva i prirody. M.: Nauka, 1995. 245 s.
  5. Vozzhenikov A.B. Nacionalnaya bezopasnost Rossii: Metodologiya kompleksnogo issledovaniya i politika obespecheniya. M.: Izd-vo RAGS, 2002. 423 s.
  6. Davletbaev R.I. Poslednyaya smena. CHernobyl. Desyat let spustya. Neizbezhnost ili sluchajnost? M.: Energoatomizdat, 1995. 166 s.
  7. Dyurkgejm E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sociologii. M., 1991. 332 s.
  8. Kapica S.P. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego. M.: Nauka, 1997. 215 s.
  9. Kastels M. Informacionnaya epoha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura. M.: GU VSHE, 2000. 608 s.
  10. Korostelev D.V. Bezopasnost lichnosti v usloviyah globalizacii: problemy i puti resheniya: dis. kand. politicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2008. 140 s.
  11. Maslov H.A. Tekhnogennaya civilizaciya v sisteme preemstvennyh form filosofskoj refleksii. Joshkar-Ola: MarGU, 2003. 320 s.
  12. Mozgovaya A.B. Tekhnologicheskij risk komponent okruzhayushchej socialnoj sredy: vospriyatie i otrazhenie v subkulture territorialnoj obshchnosti. Risk v socialnom prostranstve. 2001. Nomer 10. S. 159-180.
  13. Olejnikov YU.V. Noosfernyj proekt socioprirodnoj evolyucii. M.: Progress, 1999. 173 s.
  14. Porfirev B.N. Risk i bezopasnost: opredelenie ponyatij. M.: In-t sociologii RAN, 2001. 72 s.
  15. Suharev A.I. Sociologiya garmonizacii obshchestvennyh otnoshenij: sb. nauchnyh statej. Saransk, Izd-vo Mordovskogo universiteta, 1997. 166 s.
  16. Ursul A.D. Perspektivy evolyucii gosudarstva v modeli ustojchivogo razvitiya. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 1996. Nomer 2. S.135-137.
  17. Shojgu S.K. Katastrofy i gosudarstvo. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1997. 173 s.

Citation

Fedyanin, Vitaly Ivanovich, Kvashnina, Galina Anatolyevna, Shutkin, Alexander Nikolayevich "Specificity of Man-Made and Natural Disasters in Russia" Agrarian History, Number 25, 2026 P. 22 - 32. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18448535